Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: L.A. Women Date: Feb 18, 2008 2:44pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 60s vs 80s

I am starting to believe you have brain damage and you cant help but type the same shit over and over again. I remember the same thing being said a couple months back and I am going to say the same thing now I said then. 1965? Who the fuck is listening to 65? Thats your basis for a 60's vs 80's argument? You are incredible, even I couldn't predict this level of stupidity.

Why don't you try a 69 rider.

http://www.archive.org/details/gd69-12-28.sbd.cotsman.8999.sbeok.shnf

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: spacedface Date: Feb 19, 2008 1:46am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: 60s vs 80s

No question there are lots of 80s version better than that '69.

Lovelight was often better too -- even if 60s peaks are better.

This post was modified by spacedface on 2008-02-19 09:46:22